FBI Looking At Ending Free Speech

Global Warming may serve more than one purpose for the controlling elite

Alex Jones looks at how the United States government is using the pretense of Global Warming to ban free speech.

Advertisements

Live Stream: Infowars Announces Second Amendment Flash Rally at UT Austin

Join counter-protest against gun control group Thurs., Oct. 1 at 12 noon!
Live Stream: Infowars Announces Second Amendment Flash Rally at UT Austin

Image Credits: Guðsþegn / Wiki.

by Infowars.com | October 1, 2015


Join the counter-protest in support of the Second Amendment!

Watch the live stream:

Watch for details on the counter protest:

Thursday, Oct. 1, at 12 noon
West Mall at the University of Texas at Austin

West Mall is just west of the UT Tower pictured above.

The gun control group Moms Demand Action is planning their own “Gun Free UT” anti-freedom rally at that very location at the same time, so we need to counter their establishment propaganda with our own pro-freedom and pro-Bill of Rights rally to show Americans that their individual liberties are worth fighting for.

The rally will occur during the Alex Jones Show and reporter Joe Biggs will be on the scene reporting live.

Parking Accommodations

The University of Texas has nine parking garages available to visitors, three of which are within reasonable walking distance to West Mall:

Conference Center Garage
1900 University Ave.
beneath the AT&T Executive Education & Conference Center
Phone: (512) 232-8314
Austin, Texas 78705

San Antonio Garage (SAG)
2420 San Antonio St.
Phone: (512) 471-6549
Austin, Texas 78705

Guadalupe Garage (GUG)
1616 Guadalupe St.
Phone: (512) 471-6126
Austin, Texas 78705

There’s also other parking accommodations nearby as well as parking meters on side streets to the west and south of campus.

St. Austin Catholic Parish Parking Garage
500 W MLK Blvd. (Just West of McDonald’s)
Austin, Texas 78705

Central Parking
2008 Whitis Ave.
Austin, TX 78705

Please come to the rally and remember, you are the resistance!

Charleston, SC Mayor Blames 2nd Amendment for Shooting

Liberal media blames white “right-wing” domestic terrorism

by Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | June 18, 2015


Joseph P. Riley Jr. , the longtime Democrat mayor of Charleston, South Carolina, blamed the Second Amendment for the killing of nine people at a church in the city last night.

“I personally believe there are far too many guns out there, and access to guns, it’s far too easy. Our society has not been able to deal with that yet,” he said.

He said the Second Amendment results in “easy ability for people to gain possession” of firearms and “no doubt contributes to violent acts.”

Riley has advocated preventing Americans from exercising their constitutional right to own firearms for decades.

He said he was disappointed more Americans did not support the “major national effort” to restrict the Second Amendment following “the tragic event with the school in New England,” a reference to Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

“I’ve never stopped pushing for it,” he said of his views on rolling back the amendment. “This is just a very heartbreaking and tragic example of why it is needed.”

Polls indicate more than half of all Americans support the right to own firearms.

Move to Link Racism and Gun Violence

Gary Younge, writing for The Guardian, said after the incident that America suffers from the “twin pathologies of racism and guns” and both “are deeply rooted in the nation’s history since its founding.”

Younge said the Second Amendment fuels racist violence. “America does not have a monopoly on racism. But what makes its racism so lethal is the ease with which people can acquire guns,” he said.

He said there is a “blood-soaked pedestal erected around the constitution’s second amendment.”

Others moved to place the attack within the context of domestic terrorism.

“White right-wing domestic terrorism is one of the greatest threats to public safety and security in post 9/11 United States of America. Such a plain-spoken fact is verboten in mainstream American public discourse,” writes Chauncey DeVega for the liberal website Salon.

Vince Vaughn Is As Pro Gun As It Gets

June 1, 2015
 

World famous comedian and movie star Vince Vaughn came out with a double barrel defense of gun rights during a recent interview, calling for guns in schools and arguing the Second Amendment is intended to defend against “the supreme power of a corrupt and abusive government.”

The star of the new season of the hit HBO series “True Detective,” outlined his pro-gun views during an interview with British GQ, which released excerpts of the sit down June 1. Vaughn — who has outlined his distinctly libertarian views in recent press sit-downs — stands in sharp contrast to many of his Hollywood colleagues who call for bans on firearm ownership.

“We have the right to bear arms to resist the supreme power of a corrupt and abusive government,” Vaughn told British GQ. “It’s not about duck hunting; it’s about the ability of the individual. It’s the same reason we have freedom of speech. It’s well known that the greatest defense against an intruder is the sound of a gun hammer being pulled back.”

Vaughn went on to call for armed defense of children in schools, arguing elites have security for their kids and criminals ignore “gun-free zone” laws.

“Take mass shootings. They’ve only happened in places that don’t allow guns,” Vaughn explained, mirroring arguments from noted gun crime researcher Dr. John Lott. “In all of our schools it is illegal to have guns on campus, so again and again these guys go and shoot up these f***ing schools because they know there are no guns there.”

It is unclear whether Vaughn, who starred in beloved comedies like Wedding Crashers and Old School, will face any backlash for his views. Some Hollywood notables have teamed with anti-gun groups to push for more gun laws and many in the industry shun those with pro-Second Amendment views.

But that doesn’t seem to stop Vaughn from pushing back against his Silver Screen colleagues.

“I support people having a gun in public full stop, not just in your home,” Vaughn said. “Banning guns is like banning forks in an attempt to stop making people fat.”

House Bill Would End Online Ammo Sales

Government attacks Second Amendment while stockpiling ammo

by Jakari Jackson | Infowars.com | May 15, 2015


Introduced on Tuesday by New Jersey Rep. , H.R. 2283, known as the “Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act of 2015,” primarily seeks to “require face to face purchases of ammunition.”

Video: Mohammed Cartoon Event Organiser Slams CNN Host – “The First Amendment protects all speech not just the speech that we like”

“Increasingly we are abridging our freedoms so as not to offend savages”

by Steve Watson | InfoWars | May 4, 2015


Pamela Geller, the woman behind the freedom of speech event in Garland, Texas, that came under attack from muslim extremists has spoken out in her first interview today, slamming a CNN host for suggesting that the event was too provocative.

CNN anchor Alisyn Camerota attempted to make the case that anti-Islamist speech should not be openly encouraged in the US or elsewhere in the Western world.

Geller, who is often charged with being anti-Islamic or “Islamophobic,” fired back, arguing that “Increasingly we are abridging our freedoms so as not to offend savages.”

“The very idea that is something offends me, or I’m insulted by something, I’ll kill you, and that way I can get my way, and somehow this is OK with members of the elite media and academia, is outrageous. It’s a cartoon. It’s a cartoon.” Geller, the president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, urged.

Camerota continued the line of questioning, declaring that “No one is saying this warrants the violence,” but adding the caveat that “there’s always this fine line between freedom of speech and being intentionally incendiary and provocative.”

“Intentionally incendiary and provocative by drawing a cartoon.” Geller hit back.

“This is the low state of freedom of speech in this country,” she added. “I disagree and I disagree most vehemently.”

” The First Amendment protects all speech not just the speech that we like.” the activist continued.

Geller then used an analogy many on social media have been sharing.

“When Jesus Christ was put in a jar of urine it was called art. Did Christians like it? Of course not. Did they slaughter people? Did they burn embassies? Did they kill kill whole communities? Of course not.” Geller declared.

Meanwhile, raw video has emerged of the police responding to the attack as it was taking place. It video shows cops ushering people away from the violence and apprehending a bearded man.

http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isSlim=1

—————————————————————-

Steve Watson is a London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

Homeland Security Chief Admits He Doesn’t Understand 4th Amendment

Rand Paul grills DHS head into admission law is ‘beyond my competence’

by Steve Watson | InfoWars | April 30, 2015


During a hearing Homeland Security head Jeh Johnson admitted Wednesday that he doesn’t know or understand the laws covered by the Fourth Amendment.

Johnson was appearing at a Senate gathering on the government’s surveillance capabilities and authority, specifically regarding obtaining records from telephone companies without a warrant.

When Kentucky Senator Rand Paul began grilling Johnson, asking him whether those practices are lawful under the Fourth Amendment, which covers searches and seizures, Johnson effectively pleaded ignorance.

When Paul asked Johnson if he believes the Fourth Amendment “applies to third party records,” Johnson said that it is “beyond my competence as secretary of homeland security” to answer the question.

This is a significant problem, given that Johnson is in charge of a government agency that has been granted an extremely broad authority to issue warrants without showing probable cause before a judge.

The DHS has taken it upon itself to invade the privacy and property rights of Americans using judge-less warrants labeled as “administrative subpoenas” by the feds.

“Here’s the problem, though, your agency is in charge of cooperating and being part of this,” Paul said. “And that’s the whole debate we have in our country is whether over we should do this.”

Johnson had earlier argued that it was a hindrance to DHS that Tech companies have taken it upon themselves to encrypt their records, in order to prevent unlawful searches.

Paul noted in response that the companies are within their right to do this because they know the “over-zealous” government is seizing records at will, and it has no “sense of decency toward privacy.”

“That’s why we’re mad, and that’s why people are attempting to encrypt information is to prevent the government from doing illegal searches of our records,” Paul added.

“I would propose that there is no person named Verizon,” said Paul, adding “you do not have an individualized warrant under the Fourth Amendment when to say to Mr. Verizon we want hundreds of millions of records.”

“And this is a debate, and it’s an important one.” the presidential candidate added.

“And if we’re going to complain about encryption, and we’re going to complain about individuals wanting privacy, we really need to have a thorough discussion of the Fourth Amendment and the complaints by many of us that you’re doing something without a warrant.”

—————————————————————-

Steve Watson is a London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

You May Never Trust Another Repairman After Reading About This Stunning FBI Sting

Written by: Daniel Jennings Current Events 1 Comment Print This Article Print This Article

Image source: HuffingtonPost

FBI agents violated the Fourth Amendment by turning off the Internet and then pretending to be repairmen to enter an alleged bookie’s hotel suite and search computers without a warrant, a federal judge has ruled.

US District Judge Andrew P. Gordon also ruled that it is unconstitutional for agents to cut off Internet service without a warrant.

“They were trying everything they could to get inside without a warrant,” attorney Thomas Goldstein said of FBI agents in an interview with the Associated Press.

Goldstein represents Wei Seng Phua and a number of other men accused of running an illegal online sports book out of villas at the Caesars Palace Casino in Las Vegas.

In his opinion, Golden said the case “tests the boundaries of how far the government can go when creating a subterfuge to access a suspect’s premises.”

Learn How To Become Invisible In Today’s Surveillance State!

“Here, the government disrupted the Internet service to the defendant’s hotel room in order to generate a repair call. Government agents then posed as repairmen to gain access to the defendant’s room and conduct a surreptitious search for evidence of an illegal sports betting operation,” Gordon wrote. “By creating the need for a third party to enter defendant’s premises and then posing as repairmen to gain entry, the government violated the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.”

The Fourth Amendment protects “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,” Gordon wrote, ordering the evidence collected not be considered in determining the man’s guilt or innocence.

The evidence was collected during a joint investigation by the FBI and the Nevada Gambling Control Board (NVGCB) in the summer of 2014. The two agencies received a tip that Phua and other guests were taking online bets on World Cup Soccer.

Hotel workers reportedly saw what looked like an illegal bookie operation set up in Phua’s high roller villa.

Warrantless Searches

To get into the Villa, the FBI and NVGCB recruited Mike Wood, the owner of Wood Telemanagement & Solutions, the company that maintains the DSL service at Caesars. Wood agreed to help the FBI by cutting off Internet service and letting two of its agents poise as his employees. The two had no warrant and they were wearing recording devices.

“The ruse’s only purpose was to gain entry into villa 8882 and gather evidence without a warrant,” Gordon wrote of the agents’ behavior.

In the villa, an NVGCB agent named Ricardo Lopez and the FBI agent saw Phua and another man sitting at computers looking at sports betting sites. After leaving the villa, Lopez and the FBI applied for warrants to search the villa. The application for the warrants was based on information gathered during the warrantless search. The FBI later raided the villas and arrested Phua and his associates.

Phua only learned of the warrantless search when details of it were entered as evidence at a federal trial.

Do you agree with the judge’s ruling? What do you think about the case? Share your thoughts in the section below:

Oath Keepers Set Up Camp Outside Oregon Mining Operation Battling BLM

A security operation for the protection of Constitutional Rights

by Investment Watch | April 16, 2015


At the request of the Sugar Pine Mining Claim owners, Oath Keepers of Josephine County mission is to ensure the mining claim owners 5th Amendment Constitutional Right to Due Process is not violated by the Bureau of Land Management.

NOTICE

This is NOT a standoff with BLM. We are NOT promoting any confrontation with BLM. This is a security operation for the protection of Constitutional Rights. If you have a different agenda outside of the above peaceful mission statement, we don’t need your assistance. Please DO NOT make any type of threatening phone calls to the local BLM or USFS as it undermines our mission, professionalism and is unwarranted. Thank you.

http://www.oathkeepersjoco.com/?hc_lo…

http://www.kdrv.com/news/Mining_Opera…

https://www.facebook.com/blaine.coope…

Holder’s Gun Ban List Targets Veterans

Disarmament of the American people begins with veterans
Holder’s Gun Ban List Targets Veterans

Image Credits: U.S. Army.

by Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | April 16, 2015


In 2009 the federal government said in the now infamous rightwing extremism document leaked to Infowars and others that “veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists” and that the government was concerned these extremists would “attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to boost their violent capabilities.”

On Wednesday the Attorney General was grilled by the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee about a list denying veterans their Second Amendment right under the Constitution. The Justice Department considers the former soldiers on the list to be “mental defective.”

“It’s disturbing to think that the men and women who dedicated themselves to defending our freedom and values face undue threats to their fundamental Second Amendment rights from the very agency established to serve them,” Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley said in a statement Wednesday. “A veteran or dependent shouldn’t lose their constitutional rights because they need help with bookkeeping.”

The Justice Department has worked with the Department of Veterans Affairs to add “a disproportionate number of names” to the federal gun ban list.

“According to the Congressional Research Service, as of June 1, 2012, 99.3% of all names reported to the NICS list’s ‘mental defective’ category were provided by the Veterans Administration (VA) even though reporting requirements apply to all federal agencies,” Mr. Grassley’s letter said.

The government is using assistance requests by veterans to deny their constitutional right to own a firearm.

“Instead VA reports individuals to the gun ban list if an individual merely needs financial assistance managing VA benefits. Although the VA process is not designed to regulate firearm ownership, it results in veterans and their loved ones being barred from exercising their fundamental, Constitutionally-guaranteed Second Amendment rights,” Grassley noted.

Disarming the American People Begins with Veterans

In February 2013 Infowars.com reported on a concerted effort by the government to strip veterans of their firearms.

Constitutional attorney Michael Connelly revealed a letter “sent by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to hundreds, perhaps thousands, of America’s heroes.”

“A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition,” the VA letter states. “If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”

Connelly noted that the letter provided no specifics on the reasons for the proposed finding of incompetency and was based on a determination by a bureaucrat at the VA.

“In every state in the United States no one can be declared incompetent to administer their own affairs without due process of law and that usually requires a judicial hearing with evidence being offered to prove to a judge that the person is indeed incompetent. This is a requirement of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” he explained.

Connelly said Obama “wants a totally disarmed America so there will be no resistance to his plans to rob us of our nation. That means we have to ask who will be next. If you are receiving a Social Security check will you get one of these letters? Will the government declare that you are incompetent because of your age and therefore banned from firearm ownership. It certainly fits in with the philosophy and plans of the Obama administration. It is also certain that our military veterans don’t deserve this and neither do any other Americans.”